Skip to content

Resistance Management

Basic Principles

Ensuring long-term success in chemical pest control (which is another way of saying “preventing resistance development”) rests on the same three basic principles as ensuring long-term success in any other hostile encounter.  First, you need to know your enemy.  Secondly, you need to use a multiple attack strategy.  Relying on a single tactic is usually doomed to failure, even if this tactic is sound in general (just think of an army that consists exclusively of tank brigades, without infantry, aviation, or engineering corps).  Third, you need to strike hard, but stop once the adversary seizes hostilities and is ready to surrender.  Remember that even a morning dove may become ferocious when cornered. 

Knowledge Foundation

Although many details still need to be figured out, a significant amount of information on imidacloprid resistance in the Colorado potato beetle is already available. First, we know that resistance is a matter of frequency of resistant individuals in the population.  Simple presence of resistant genes does not mean that a particular insecticide is doomed.  As long as resistant individuals are few and far between, effective control may still be achieved.  Secondly, in the absence of insecticides, fitness of resistant individuals is usually low compared to susceptible individuals.  They have lower reproductive success, higher mortality, and are incapable of successful competition with their susceptible brethren.  Third, resistant alleles are usually incompletely dominant, meaning that the level of resistance in hybrid crosses between resistant and susceptible beetles are somewhere in between that of their parents.  Finally, when such hybrids mate with each other, some of their offspring will be highly resistant.

Plan of Action

1. Do not rely on insecticides alone.  Every grower should practice crop rotation, which has been repeatedly shown to suppress Colorado potato beetle populations.  Rotated fields should be located as far from the previous year’s crop as possible, so that the beetles have difficulty finding them. This would allow reducing the number of insecticide applications necessary to control the beetles (Fig. 1), thus reducing selection pressure towards resistance development.

crop rotation chart

Fig. 1. Mean number of insecticide applications required to control Colorado potato beetles on non-rotated and rotated commercial potato fields during the 2005 growing season in Southern Maine (A. Alyokhin, unpublished data).

2. Do not follow an insecticide with ANY other insecticides that have similar chemistry within the same season.  Similar chemicals are likely to poison their target insects in a similar way. Therefore, if an insect becomes capable of overcoming one of them, it is fairly likely that it will also overcome another one that has a similar chemical structure and mode of action (Fig. 2). This phenomenon is known as cross-resistance.

Colorado potato beetle defoliation on experimental plots treated with Admire

Colorado potato beetle defoliation on plots treated with Platinum

Fig. 2. Damage done by imidacloprid-resistant Colorado potato beetles to experimental plots treated at planting with in-furrow formulations of two different neonicotinoid insecticides. A-plots treated with imidacloprid (Admire); B-plots treated with thiamethoxam (Platinum). Pictures are taken on August 4, 2005.

Insecticide Resistance Action Committee arranged all insecticides in groups based on the similarities in their chemical structures and modes of action (ways how they kill their target pests). Insecticides belonging to different mode of action groups (see Table 4.1 below) should be rotated throughout the growing season.

Table 1. Insecticides registered for the Colorado potato beetle control arranged by the mode of action group developed by the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee. Products belonging to the same group should never be used after each other.

Group

Subgroup

Mode of Action

Chemical group

Product names

1

A

Acetylcholine esterase inhibitors

Carbamates

Furadan, Lannate, Sevin, Temik1, Vydate

 

B

 

Organophosphates

Dimethoate, Di-Syston, , Guthion, Imidan, Malathion, Methyl Parathion, Mocap, Monitor, Penncap-M, Thimet/Phorate

 

 

 

 

 

2

A

GABA-gated chloride channel antagonists

Cyclodiene organochlorines

Phaser/Endosulfan

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Sodium channel modulators

Pyrethroids, Pyrethrins

Ambush, Asana, Baythroid, Decis, Leverage1, Pounce

 

 

 

 

 

4

A

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists / antagonists

Neonicotinoids

Actara, Admire, Alias, Assail, Belay, Cruiser, Gaucho, Genesis, Leverage2, Pasada, Platinum, Provado, Voliam Flexi3

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists (other than group 4)

Spinosyns

Success/SpinTor

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Chloride channel activators

Avermectins

ABBA, Agri-Mek

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

Microbial disruptors of insect midgut membranes

Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis

Javelin, Dipel, Novodor, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Inhibitors of chitin biosynthesis, type 0, Lepidopteran

Benzoylurea

Rimon

 

 

 

 

 

18

B

Ecdysone agonists / moulting disruptors

Azadirachtin

Azadirect, Ecozin

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

Voltage-dependent sodium channel blocker

Indoxacarb

Avaunt

 

 

 

 

 

25

 

Neuronal inhibitors
(unknown mode of action)

Bifenazate

Acramite

 

 

 

 

 

28

 

Ryanodine receptor modulators

Diamides

Altacor, Coragen, Voliam Flexi2

 

 

 

 

 

un

 

Compounds of unknown or nonspecific mode of action (selective feeding blockers)

Cryolite

Kryocide

1Temik is not registered for use in the State of Maine. Check with the local regulatory authorities on its availability in other areas.

2Leverage is a mixture of Baythroid (a pyrethroid) and Provado (a neonicotinoid). As such, it should follow neither pyrethroids nor neonicotinoids in a rotation sequence.

3Voliam Flexi is a mixture of rynaxypyr (a diamide) and thiamethoxam (a neonicotinoid). As such, it should follow neither diamides nor neonicotinoids in a rotation sequence.

3. Use economic thresholds when making decisions about spraying.  Not only does chasing every single beetle with a sprayer result in a waste of time and money, but also it contributes to rapid resistance development.  Trying to kill all the beetles with insecticides usually results in killing all susceptible beetles.  Only resistant beetles survive (that’s why they are called resistant in the first place).  When resistant beetles mate with each other, all their progeny are resistant.  When resistant beetles mate with susceptible beetles, their progeny are less resistant, and usually can be killed by the full label rate of insecticide.

4. Leave refuges for susceptible beetles.  If you apply insecticide in furrow or as a seed treatment to the whole field, you cannot use economic thresholds.  However, you still need to supply susceptible mates for resistant beetles. Unless you intend to run a dating service for lonely beetles, leaving a few untreated rows at planting is your best solution.  If needed, those can be treated later with foliar sprays.

5. Use full label rate of insecticides.  Otherwise, you might not kill the hybrids between resistant and susceptible beetles (see above).

Preventing resistance is as essential a part of good insecticide stewardship as minimizing drift or wearing personal protective equipment.  Similar to most other problems, it is easier avoided than mitigated. Therefore, necessary steps should be taken before insecticide failure becomes noticeable in the field.